Every impact network has unique strengths, priorities, and challenges.

No single resource model fits all contexts.

The table below gives a side-by-side comparison of the seven key resource models by highlighting:

And more.

<aside> 🔎

This overview is a practical tool to help you decide which model—or mix of models—best meets your network’s needs, values, and long-term sustainability goals.

Choose the approach that aligns with your vision and supports your network’s growth.

</aside>

Overview:

Model Core Mechanism Best For Challenges How to Succeed Pitfalls Key Resources
The Hive Resource-sharing among members Networks with strong trust & shared ownership Unequal participation, unclear contribution agreements Use participatory governance & clear engagement agreements Burnout, lack of engagement from majority Time, skills, services, expertise
The Bridge Partnerships & sponsorships Networks needing infrastructure or technical resources Balancing commercial interests, shared expectations Develop win-win agreements, set clear boundaries Legal & compliance issues, misaligned goals Financial sponsorship, knowledge access
The Spiral Circular economy & resource reuse Social enterprises & localized networks Cultural shift, funding for adaptation Leverage shared infrastructure & systemic resource flow Hard to track resources, needs infrastructure Shared assets, recycled materials, knowledge
The Catalyst Revenue from events, training, services Networks with strong convening power High upfront costs, reaching enough customers Design high-value services, ensure pricing accessibility Market demand fluctuations, pricing strategy Revenue from ticket sales & services
The Garden Membership fees Networks with a broad, engaged membership Ensuring sustained member value, slow build-up Develop tiered membership options & strong value proposition Risk of exclusivity, difficulty in scaling Recurring financial contributions
The Pollinator Grants & philanthropic funding Networks aligned with funder priorities Dependency on funders, alignment with priorities Create funding ecosystems & participatory governance Funding unpredictability, requires strong relationships Grants, funding pools, capacity-building
The Marketplace Revenue-sharing from member activities Consultant networks with strong client demand Tracking contributions, balancing flexibility & quality Establish clear revenue-sharing principles & service quality standards Income inconsistency, requires transparent tracking Shared revenue, job opportunities, expertise

<aside> đź§­

NAVIGATION

The Hive: Resource Sharing

The Bridge: Partner & Sponsorships

The Catalyst: Network Enterprise

The Garden: Membership Fees

The Spiral: Circular Economy

The Pollinator: Grants & Funding

The Marketplace: Revenue Sharing

Comparison of Models

</aside>